Conversation
bd7d391 to
e1957ba
Compare
Coverage reportClick to see where and how coverage changed
This report was generated by python-coverage-comment-action |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
@austinweisgrau is this still a work in progress? It's missing docs and tests but I can do a review of the code if you want, or I can wait til you're ready |
|
The code is good to go! I should prob add docs and tests tho huh
…On Tue, Feb 18, 2025, 1:57 PM Shauna Gordon-McKeon ***@***.***> wrote:
@austinweisgrau <https://github.com/austinweisgrau> is this still a work
in progress? It's missing docs and tests but I can do a review of the code
if you want, or I can wait til you're ready
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1283 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AO74QHTB7PQU2UWZQFPZJ5L2QOUDJAVCNFSM6AAAAABWVBE4OCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMNRXGAYTGNJTGI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
[image: shaunagm]*shaunagm* left a comment (move-coop/parsons#1283)
<#1283 (comment)>
@austinweisgrau <https://github.com/austinweisgrau> is this still a work
in progress? It's missing docs and tests but I can do a review of the code
if you want, or I can wait til you're ready
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1283 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AO74QHTB7PQU2UWZQFPZJ5L2QOUDJAVCNFSM6AAAAABWVBE4OCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMNRXGAYTGNJTGI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
|
I forget whether you've made a new connector before, but just in case you haven't or you forgot the steps, the new connector guide has all the details (probably too many details for your experience level!). Docs and tests sections are near the bottom. |
shaunagm
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just updating the status to 'request changes' as we need docs/tests. No rush!
e1957ba to
204af00
Compare
|
Added docs and tests, should be good to go 🫡 |
|
|
||
|
|
||
| class Daisychain: | ||
| def __init__(self, api_token: str): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This doesn't seem like it's doing the typical check for an environmental variable version of the api_token?
No description provided.